Each year thousands of visitors pay serious money to Heritage England to walk around a site of no particular importance, because the Heritage England organisation has failed to deliver any evidence that the Battle of Hastings took place at Battle Abbey. Not a single find or more important historical document written at the time supports the site at Battle Abbey, despite the organisation employing so called experts to verify it. Every expert has produced old evidence that is shown to be completely flawed, without addressing the issues raised in the last twenty years research concerning Domesday data and evidence of eye witness accounts of the battle. These feature two Malfosse incidents described that cannot be true at Battle Abbey, plus line of site evidence that does not stand the test of physical checking.
It is an extraordinary dereliction of their duty not to examine the documentary evidence in the historic record and compare it to the correct site detailed within these pages. This web site, a public document, is written by a member of the Royal Historical Society. It calls for those historians in the Heritage Battlefield Committee, who refused to read or accept the evidence in the first application, to examine and change the now discredited regulated site at Battle. We also call upon those responsible for this history debarkle at Heritage England to resign. To hold a phd in historical study has no value when you are shown to be within the control of a historical establishment that pays no attention to those who died in the greatest battle in English history. To ignore the claim is a travesty, which has continued for over twelve years since the first publication of the book Secrets of the Norman Invasion (2011).
Above in the photo you can see the ‘fake plaque’ positioned on the 13th century ruin at Battle Abbey, put there by Heritage England to promote their own site interests. It states that it is a “tradition” that Harold fell there - without a shred of evidence to prove it. It is amazing, but not surprising in the current political climate, that the media simply accept their word without looking into it, by examining what was actually written down at the time. This is what the Royal Historical Society is meant to do when it approves such a site. The false claim made by monks at Battle Abbey, was rightly rejected by the king around 1155AD, because the King realised the evidence for a ‘tradition’ was inherently flawed. There is and was no ‘tradition’ other than those who endorse the bishops lies in an effort to make money from a low quality tourist attraction - the remains of Battle Abbey. No -one can doubt that Battle Abbey exists, but beyond that it has no evidence written or said by William the Conqueror upon which it can claim to support the validation of such a false statement.
It is now acknowledged that the web site at Heritage England has changed its previously ‘weasily text’ written by Roy Porter to confirm now, without actually saying it, that the site of the Battle of Hastings is NOT at the Battle Abbey site, having told us for twenty years that it was. All assumptions made by English Heritage are false, indeed a historical lie not backed by any evidence. However they make the case that the ‘tradition’ story somehow authenticates it. However, ‘tradition’ could not come into effect in 1180, when the document presented by the monks at Battle Abbey was first published, because it used source documents written very close to 1066. Ones that English Heritage experts will not appear to read. This is Fake News of the worst kind, designed to mislead the public and must now be stopped. Those Saxons and Normans who fought at the Battle of Hastings must be acknowledged in order for the souls of the dead, who died in that battle, to be released to their Christian God to continue their lives as planned. They, like the crows that return to the battlefield in Crowhurst each night are seeking their own spiritual freedom and must receive the blessing of the Divine Spirit in a state of grace. Their graves must be sanctified and Christian customs, including proper burial with a priest present, must be undertaken. To make excuses that the site where they fought and died is not now known cannot stand independent evaluation or scrutiny. That evaluation is provided within these pages. The Battlefield committee must re-evaluate the site taking into account the claims in this web site and also the new book 1066 The Battlefield by Nick Austin, which identifies the burial stone of King Harold on the battlefield in Crowhurst. The document the Chronicle of Battle Abbey is an authentic ancient historical document containing information from 1066 that confirms it is the correct site.
It is no longer possible to make believe the authorities have done their due diligence, as the boats have also been identified upon which the Bayeux Tapestry confirms the events detailed in 13 Chronicles, written at that time. Then you must look at the finds from the web site in the book written. Now it can be seen that the failings of these men who seek to write their own glorified alternative version of history must be stamped upon, and their false history extinguished by the sword of the spoken word that has revealed the truth. In order to understand it you must read the source documents yourself and then compare them to the ground upon which the battle was fought. This web site gives you the source information and is not missleading you as you have been to date. You must fight for your right to know the truth. This web site has come about because eminent historians have refused to listen to date, believing that they have the right to withold it from you. History professors at eminent Universities, who should know better, have held their heads in shame because in their view they cannot be wrong.This is a hot subject and the time for change has come. Young people do not take false hypothesis against actual evidence. Do not worry that all historians to date have named the Battle site as the site of the battle of Hastings. Every claimed site has been examined except the one where the battle took place in Crowhurst.They have all missidentifeid and misstranslated the original Latin text and now those who have looked seek those who have no axe to grind to re-evaluate the evidence which is damning upon the establishment who have contrived to allow this to happen.