About the Researchers
Who We Are
This project is led by Nick Austin, author of the acclaimed volumes Secrets of the Norman Invasion: One and Secrets of the Norman Invasion: Two. With years of dedicated fieldwork, manuscript study, and topographical analysis, Nick has developed a rigorous, evidence-driven approach to reexamining the Battle of Hastings. The research team combines expertise in historical analysis, philology, geospatial mapping, and archaeological investigation.
Our Published Works
Secrets of the Norman Invasion: One
One is the foundational volume of your research into the true location and context of the Battle of Hastings. This book presents a comprehensive analysis of early manuscript sources, topographical evidence, and field investigations. Through meticulous comparison of thirteen primary manuscripts, the volume reconstructs the events surrounding the Norman landing and the subsequent battle, challenging the traditional narrative centered on Battle Abbey. The work is distinguished by its transparent methodology, including detailed translation notes, geospatial analysis, and on-the-ground surveys. By documenting both the evidence and the research process, this volume establishes a rigorous, scholarly framework that underpins the website’s core claims and invites further academic review.
Secrets of the Norman Invasion: Two
Two builds on the foundation of the first volume, expanding the scope of research and deepening the analysis of both manuscript and physical evidence. This book introduces new findings from additional site visits, advanced GIS mapping, and correspondence with subject-matter experts. It addresses critiques and alternative interpretations, providing a balanced discussion of uncertainties and limitations. The volume also explores the broader historical context, examining how the evolving landscape and subsequent scholarship have shaped our understanding of the battle’s location. By integrating new data and engaging with peer commentary, this second volume demonstrates an ongoing commitment to transparency, scholarly rigor, and open academic dialogue.
Our Research Methods
- Comparative manuscript analysis
- Translation and philological study
- Topographical correlation using GIS and field surveys
- Transparent documentation of methodology, limitations, and uncertainties
- Engagement with peer review and academic correspondence
Why We Undertook This Study
Our aim is to evaluate whether the traditional interpretation of the Battle of Hastings aligns with the earliest available sources. By combining manuscript evidence, landscape analysis, and fieldwork, we seek to provide a transparent, academically rigorous alternative for historians, archaeologists, and interested readers.
Connect With Us
We welcome scholarly review, critique, and correspondence. For academic queries, media requests, or site visits, please use the contact page.